Subject: re: Prototype kernel continuation-passing for NetBSD
To: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/27/2004 19:18:33 
   
   I wonder; there's a weird problem with softintr's on sparc64, if it's
   this easy to convert to kcont, doing so might either expose or
   eliminate the problem?


i doubt it; the problem isn't with softintr's in general.  it is
with the softclock interrupt *only*.


.mrg.