Subject: Re: pool page header allocation strategy
To: enami tsugutomo <enami@but-b.or.jp>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/18/2004 11:29:33
--Apple-Mail-6-41125670
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Feb 14, 2004, at 6:31 PM, enami tsugutomo wrote:
> I'd like to change pool page header allocation strategy as follows:
>
> 1) If the header fits in the page without wasting any items,
> put it there.
>
> 2) Don't put the header in the page if it may consume large
> part of the page (only this is the current strategy) or it
> may consume rather big item.
>
> For example, on i386, pools like fdescpl or sigapl will be affected by
> 1) and pools like buf1k or buf2k will be affected by 2).
This looks fine to me. Saving space == good :-)
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
--Apple-Mail-6-41125670
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
name=PGP.sig
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFAM70dOpVKkaBm8XkRAjDSAJwMTPDBuTkfixz1vcQHcUZjyBaFZQCgkmHi
8UUaiAee8Yn/oP0gKjp9+r4=
=euDJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail-6-41125670--