--rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:37:39AM +0200, Brad du Plessis wrote:
> > If we aren't going to fix this by removing the route caching altogether,
>=20
> Is removing the cache altogether not the right solution? Are
> there significant performance hits in removing the cache?

I haven't measured it - but think of outgoing packets being fragmented by=
=20
IP - they're back-to-back using - obviously - the same destination=20
address.

Regards,
	-is
--=20
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/

--rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAGkklN4tiz3B8hB0RAtGzAKCMQXVtmA6c0uiPjoMRlqUMamAe1wCgh7QO
QK9Or6UWHXSOjSF9Ucabnqc=
=cS+0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm--