Subject: sysctl variadicity [was Re: packet capturing]
To: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
List: tech-kern
Date: 01/21/2004 18:38:59
Thanks, I didn't know c99 had standardized that.
However.. I'm still skeptical whether a macro can figure out how deep
the variadic call should be for a given point in the mib.
If a macro can do that, then we shouldn't need to expose the variadic
functions as part of the API. The API could instead wrap the variadic
functions with suitable fixed-length versions for node/int/struct, a
la FreeBSD's SYSCTL_{NODE,INT,STRUCT} macros.
That's my real gripe. Maybe Andrew can clarify why the API has to be
variadic.