Subject: Re: packet capturing
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Perry E. Metzger <email@example.com>
Date: 01/20/2004 17:42:04
Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> writes:
> We could make bpf_bufsize sysctl'able; or raise the default to
> something that reduces bpf drop at high packet rate (somewhere between
> 128 and 512k); or both.
> Which of these would you support?
Both. The default probably should be jacked up only on larger memory
machines though (which is an easy calculation during boot...)
Perry E. Metzger firstname.lastname@example.org