Subject: Re: dev/audiobell.c proposal
To: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
From: Jukka Marin <jmarin@embedtronics.fi>
List: tech-kern
Date: 01/11/2004 10:44:38
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 05:29:29PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> If instead, audio was a device that walked the list of available
> audioN devices until it found one that wasn't already open, then most
> apps - and their view of device close semantics - would just continue
> to work.
The application may want to open the corresponding /dev/mixerN as well -
how would this be possible? (Ie. if the application is using the
underlying /dev/audio3, it also wants to use /dev/mixer3, not /dev/mixer2.)
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:47:22PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> well, no. keep the software audio mixer *in userland* [1].
>
> [1] gnome & kde both have such daemons, and i believe there is at least
> one more that's (now less) commonly used...
In kde at least, the sound daemon seems to cause a varying delay to sounds
so they get played back too late.
-jm