Subject: Re: kdump dependency on kernel, ktrace id portability
To: Greywolf <email@example.com>
From: Nathan J. Williams <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/09/2004 14:38:46
Greywolf <email@example.com> writes:
> Thus spake Nathan J. Williams ("NJW> ") sometime Today...
> NJW> It still doesn't solve much of a problem. Having to rebuild kdump
> NJW> occasionally when you're hacking on the kernel just isn't much of a
> NJW> burden.
> It's not a huge burden, but it's sufficiently annoying to qualify as
> a hemorrhoid. Every time I build a new kernel, to have to go and rebuild
> kdump is kind of a drag.
It's not every time you build a new kernel, just every time you build
a new kernel with new syscalls and discover subsequently that kdump
isn't displaying all the syscalls. *then* you can go rebuild kdump to
see the things you're missing. How often does that happen?