Subject: Re: ffs compatibility patches
To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 01/09/2004 06:37:14
--t4apE7yKrX2dGgJC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:38:45PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > certainly, the bug is still there.  only last week i was semi-screwed by
> > this problem - booting a -current kernel on a year old -current system.
>=20
> So before the UFS2 integration, right ?

That's the point.  The concern is for users now running 1.6 before the
relevant changes were pulled into that branch (or 1.5) who upgrade to
2.0. =20

I'd like to be convinced that there's no lossage scenario for them,
but at the moment I'm not.

--
Dan.


--t4apE7yKrX2dGgJC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE//bFqEAVxvV4N66cRAsH0AKC1v/H/RpPf+bK5AH4HnnKnV5vn4gCgqfv0
0L/P9XpMi3npvnxYgQ9Ndew=
=c+LE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--t4apE7yKrX2dGgJC--