Subject: Re: Rework of ATA code to support native SATA controllers
To: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 12/29/2003 11:53:36
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Dec 16, 2003, at 2:30 PM, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> atabus is really very little code. It can be moved anywhere else
> problems. But it may not be worth the trouble to try to share it with
> SATA, especially as it has a different probe routine.
There is a very good reason to split out the atabus code that I forgot
to mention before...
If you want to have the probe-order enforced, you must do this.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----