Subject: Re: SMP re-entrancy in kernel drivers/"bottom half?"
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/17/2003 18:52:51
--Apple-Mail-40-1066974433
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed


On Dec 17, 2003, at 4:15 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

>>> are you suggesting a "global" SPL? (ie. not per cpu)
>>
>> Of course; thats one thing the spinlocks do.
>
> it sounds like a regression.

It is definitely a regression.  It is allowed *today* for one CPU to be 
at splclock() and another CPU to take a clock interrupt and run some 
code.

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>


--Apple-Mail-40-1066974433
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
	name=PGP.sig
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQE/4RaDOpVKkaBm8XkRAnsSAJ4kgQHMuat4/6l39zNIfSIObXheRACfZRdV
UtQ3/o/abKF+/IWmwML5CEM=
=Bftn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail-40-1066974433--