Subject: Re: large inode numbers
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/17/2003 09:21:44
--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:43:30PM -0800, Greywolf wrote:

> [I thought that maybe having (FAT slot + 2) would be good, but my ignoran=
ce
> must precede me.  I'm sure the more technoscenti are laughing at my idioc=
y.]

I did the math yestereve, and just in time discovered that=20

a) we get a 128 GB limit
b) that's exactly what our current msdosfs code is doing

before posting.

Regards,
	-is

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBP+ASEjCn4om+4LhpAQG5Lgf+PTCPbkYwuOHn3PJ0wXjx3jpIWeBkbOkH
PKACyVacQEcNv4neo3NxvSzRjjx2/Vc1kedtlq3G8/dWjHMiifgVO++1OFW9NmJ5
sGx5jbUMO0sD9dS/TZzG4kMsGbwp9YnPdeyVuqZ7XxMYCTN9MGGYcI4U8QxnZSxw
IXtacMmh++e8AYhStVsjwEeVK+C4Z4xaD/foZsSPiXkz2NHk897iNd5wiFHM+jCg
z8ilaR69G2gBtcMEQj6ObAKrYFnUxRc9f3nDKSoLn1WikQL2G5txgeNxhny23pXA
DQBRnjoP/7eoIllFdXpcjP0FGZUcx3TlXpKVYY1h69dASnbnRvJLPw==
=Eu1O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--