Subject: Re: ntpd oddities possibly related to sysctl change
To: Frederick Bruckman <fredb@immanent.net>
From: Sean Davis <dive@endersgame.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/09/2003 00:42:40
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:08:26PM -0600, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Sean Davis wrote:
> 
> > Andrew: if this isn't related to the sysctl changes, sorry in advance, but
> > that's the only thing changed that I can think of between the time ntpd was
> > working as it used to be, and when it was working as it is now.
> 
> Better, or worse? "ntpd" was just updated to 4.2.0.

I'm not sure if it's problematic or not - I'm just wondering about the
'kernel time sync disabled 0041' then 'kernel time sync enabled 0001'
messages.

> > Nothing in the ntp configuration has changed since I upgraded from 1.6ZF to
> > ZG, but now I see:
> >
> > Dec  8 21:33:26 eros ntpd[2131]: ntpd 4.2.0-r Mon Dec  8 02:22:34 EST 2003
> > (1)
> > Dec  8 21:33:26 eros ntpd[2131]: precision = 2.000 usec
> > Dec  8 21:33:26 eros ntpd[2131]: no IPv6 interfaces found
> > Dec  8 21:33:26 eros ntpd[2131]: kernel time sync status 0040
> > Dec  8 21:33:26 eros ntpd[2131]: frequency initialized -115.078 PPM from
> > /var/db/ntp.drift
> > Dec  8 21:37:45 eros ntpd[2131]: synchronized to 140.162.8.3, stratum=2
> > Dec  8 21:37:45 eros ntpd[2131]: kernel time sync disabled 0041
> > Dec  8 21:38:51 eros ntpd[2131]: kernel time sync enabled 0001
> 
> 
> Frederick
> 
-Sean

--
/~\ The ASCII
\ / Ribbon Campaign                   Sean Davis
 X  Against HTML                       aka dive
/ \ Email!