Subject: Re: NetBSD 2.0 release date
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: John Franklin <email@example.com>
Date: 12/09/2003 00:23:49
On Dec 8, 2003, at 1:46 PM, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> I don't think we need to do it for a few more years yet, but I think=20=
> it is
> something we can now tackle (right) when we choose to.
We intend to bump the major version of the OS with the next release, so=20=
*if* we are going to bump the major version of libc in the near future=20=
it would make sense to do it with the major bump of the OS. =46rom 1.x=20=
to 2.x, people expect there might be issues, such as significant=20
libraries being rev'd. It may not be something we *need* to do, but if=20=
we do it now, we won't need to do it again until NetBSD 3.0.
It's something we can do. It's something we want to do. It's=20
something we have the opportunity to do.
So, let's choose to do it now.
ICBM: 35=B043'56"N 78=B053'27"W