Subject: Re: NEW_BUFQ_STRATEGY
To: None <tls@rek.tjls.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/05/2003 08:52:18
--Apple-Mail-84--5857888
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed


On Dec 5, 2003, at 7:18 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:

> One thing I'm not so sure about is using a FCFS queue for the "time
> sensitive" requests.  I think that the average latency for requests 
> from
> that queue is probably significantly increased by using FCFS rather 
> than
> the increasing-block-number sort, because we lose the benefit of
> readahead, which will be particularly severe if the queues are long.  
> The
> sort seems particularly likely to be beneficial given the rather large
> number of requests we take from the queues in a "burst" and the 
> consequent
> likelihood that we'd get a lot of track cache hits.

Yah, I agree with this analysis.

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>


--Apple-Mail-84--5857888
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
	name=PGP.sig
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQE/0LfHOpVKkaBm8XkRAldSAKC/FhYoT6GEEDEfAC6mAc+8qAQTdQCgwwhd
/8RbLHrgLF1S+sOM1GoyXKU=
=q3iR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail-84--5857888--