Subject: Re: NEW_BUFQ_STRATEGY
To: None <email@example.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/05/2003 20:23:12
> On Dec 3, 2003, at 5:38 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > because synchronous writes, which nfsd often requests, easily suffer?
> > i guess explicitly distinguishing sync/async requests like the
> > attached diff makes it better.
> Cool, though I guess BUFQ_READ_PRIO should no longer be the name of the
> queueing discipline... perhaps just BUFQ_PRIO?
i think it's better to leave BUFQ_READ_PRIO as-is and create a new one
for people who like benchmarks... :)