Subject: Re: SIGTRAP for traced processes and COMPAT_MACH
To: Emmanuel Dreyfus <email@example.com>
From: Jaromir Dolecek <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/01/2003 13:31:48
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> I implemented my yesterday's proposal (an emulation hooked cheksignal
> function in kpsignal2 and trapsignal), and this works fine. I'm awaiting
> for opinions about this before committing it...
No, this should not be checked in.
Why you don't provide COMPAT_MACH specific sendsig function,
which would take care to send exception instead of signal if appropriate?
Then everything would Just Work without COMPAT_MACH-specific
tweaks in MI (native) path.
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org> http://www.NetBSD.cz/
-=- We should be mindful of the potential goal, but as the Buddhist -=-
-=- masters say, ``You may notice during meditation that you -=-
-=- sometimes levitate or glow. Do not let this distract you.'' -=-