Subject: Re: postfix broken by AF_LOCAL semantics change
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 11/29/2003 16:38:54
>>> [...], then it quite easy for a swarm of requests to overwhelm an
>>> accepting server since his backlog can be exceeded before he even
>>> gets scheduled to run.
>> This can happen even with block-until-accept behaviour; it just
>> takes lots of processes. Which is probably what you would have
>> anyway; how often does a single process connect to the same server
>> again before carrying out whatever protocol the first connection is
>> intended for?
> *cough* Threads. *cough*
So s/process/thread/ in my argument; the rest of it remains the same.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML email@example.com
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B