Subject: Re: atareg.h macro naming rule
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>
Date: 11/28/2003 09:49:05
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 10:06:25AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > > > they seem very inconsisitent to me.
> > > > i'd like to add definitions for some new bits
> > > > but i'm not sure which prefix i should use.
> > > > WDC_CMD2_, WDC_CAP_, ATA_CMD2_, or something else?
> > >
> > > WDC_ is for ata/atapi, ATA_ is for ata only.
> > Yes.
> > I didn't check recently, but I don't think there are atapi-specific bits yet
> > (at last not in our atareg.h file)
> we have ATA_CMD2_APM, ATA_CMD2_CFA, ATA_CMD2_RWQ.
> all of them are not atapi specific, IIRC.
No, these are ATA specific.
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI. Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
NetBSD: 24 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference