Subject: Re: kqueue, NOTE_EOF
To: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: marius aamodt eriksen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/12/2003 13:57:38
* Jason Thorpe <email@example.com> [031112 13:54]:
> On Nov 12, 2003, at 10:40 AM, marius aamodt eriksen wrote:
> >correct - this is the difference, kqueue will not yield any event at
> So, kqueue should simply be changed to report the event. I don't see
> any need for a separate EOF flag. EOF can simply be determined as
> normal in the kqueue case as well.
right - the idea was to preserve existing semantics, while leaving the
poll-like semantics optional.
marius a eriksen <firstname.lastname@example.org> | http://monkey.org/~marius/