Subject: Re: Dynamic registry of ehternet frame types
To: Martin Husemann <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 11/12/2003 07:47:10
On Nov 11, 2003, at 11:49 PM, Martin Husemann wrote:
> This has the additional advantage that it enables LKMs to register and
> additional ethernet frame types. It would not affect the efficiency of
> hardwired frame types.
> Do you think this is worth the effort?
Yes. I would actually like to see the entire input path use
dynamically-registered handlers, and eliminate that big switch
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>