Subject: Re: Dynamic registry of ehternet frame types
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Martin Husemann <email@example.com>
Date: 11/12/2003 09:30:55
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:19:12AM +0100, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> Well, arguably we could make the 3com types aliases of the RFC 2516 ones. But
> I would prefer a way to tell the kernel, "I'm using this implementation".
Well, when we step away from the one RFC conformant implementation I prefer
to go all the way to full configurable, not only to one single alternative.
This is the first exception to the rule, the second will happen imediately
once the next release is out. Or sooner.