Hi!

Recently I added the USB Ids for the
Acer BT-500 Bluetooth USB Adapter

It does not, however, have the normal "Acer" USB vendor id;
according to the Linux USB Ids list, the vendor Id belongs
to "Zeevo, Inc." -- the packaging material only mentions Acer,
though.

Except for the Linux USB Ids list (at
http://wwwbode.cs.tum.edu/Par/arch/usb/linux-usb/usb.ids)
I didn't find an official list of Ids.
How do we want this handled? Should it report
itself as Zeevo, Inc. BT-500 or as Acer BT-500
(as it does now)?
And what will we do if Zeevo, Inc (if that's the
manufacturer) will produce it's next adapter for
a different reseller?

Cheers,
 Thomas