Subject: Re: Patch to disallow mounts of unclean FFS unless forced
To: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Charles M. Hannum <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/14/2003 15:37:37
On Monday 13 October 2003 06:49 pm, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Monday, October 13, 2003, at 11:09 AM, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> > Comments?
> Darrin pointed out to me that it should be allowed to mount an unclean
> FFS that was softdep-enabled, since the only inconsistencies in that
> case should be lost file system blocks.
That theory dates back to something Kirk said years ago, which he has now
recanted because I pointed out several cases where he was wrong.