On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:41:57PM +0900, Christopher SEKIYA wrote:
> There seems to be a second, related problem with newfs: without specifying
> -s, llsize isn't properly initialized.  This results in the sanity checks
> around newfs.c:573 to do the wrong thing -- the way I see it (and please
> correct me if I am wrong), if a size isn't explicitly specified newfs should
> use all available space.

Revs 1.71, 1.72 and 1.73 all look like bugs!

	David

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk