Subject: Re: [README] MI device major assignment
To: Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>
From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/11/2003 09:28:52
--t5NgoZwlhlUmGr82
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Saturday, 11 October 2003 at 0:27:02 +0200, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
> Bill Studenmund wrote:
>> I like Luke's less-prefered choice of having local ones 144-159 and
>> having MI ones from 160 on up. Mainly as we will keep adding devices over
>> time, and eventually we will get past 256.
>
> Okay, should we flip a coin? :) Anyway, this makes sense indeed.
>
> I'll make it so - 144-159 local/distr and 160+ new-style, and
> change crypto&pf (and vinum) to use 160, 161 & 162.
To avoid any further surprises, note that Vinum has a block major as
well. I'd give the same number to both. This marginally favours
giving Vinum 160 so that both major numbers are the same. Any
objections?
Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
--t5NgoZwlhlUmGr82
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/h0e8IubykFB6QiMRAjwBAJ4wU81tYuSAgFwsJSKuAYJ8ozFe5gCgsvDJ
Kluf3Ij4SyJa26e7QwP1tlg=
=sHdS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--t5NgoZwlhlUmGr82--