On Saturday 27 September 2003 10:01, Andrew Brown wrote:
> >Hmm.  Some changes were already made by atatat but I think I will go ahead
> >with my changes anyway.  He changed Pxxx to Kxxx in kernfs (inconsistently
> > - Pkern was changed to Kern instead of Kkern) and I think that more
> > description (KFSxxx and PFSxxx) makes more sense.
>
> you know...when i looked at Kkern, it just didn't look right, that's
> why it's different.  :)

Yah, I figured that.  KFSkern looks OK though.

> yes, lsof does define _KERNEL to get to that stuff, and a lot of other
> stuff, too.  drat.  that means i have to go fix lsof again.  well, at
> least this is all happening close together temporally...

Ah.  Sorry about that.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@netbsd.org>
http://www.NetBSD.org/