On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> Sorry- it's been my experience, that at l east for me, it *is* expensive
> to get the pullup request formatted exactly right. I always seem to take
> 2 runs at getting it right. That has caused me to defer attempting
> pullups unless it's realyl important.

I too think the pullup request is a bit over-bureaucratic with them
wanting a source-changes mail, but I guess we cannot do much about that.
The way to get such a message is to do a "cvs log -r1.89 isp_pci.c", then
grab the date (20003/08/07) and find the commit mail for that date, file &
revision on mail-index.netbsd.org, then forward that to releng and hope
it's enough.

For this pullup, sending the following URL to releng-1-6 should be enough

 http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2003/08/07/0000.html

(which, btw, I'd say is not only a printf change, looking at these
different PCI mappings, but I know ~nothing about that so it may really be
not worth it).


 - Hubert

P.S.; It maybe nice to document handling of pullup requests by
      non-developers like this.

-- 
  ___ _ _  _   _        * Harddisk Image Cloning *
 / __| | || | | |           www.feyrer.de/g4u/
| (_ |_  _| |_| |
 \___| |_| \___/          v1.12 out now, including partition support!