Subject: Re: sa/pthread smp concurrency (includes patch)
To: Frank van der Linden <email@example.com>
From: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/15/2003 09:34:44
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Frank van der Linden wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:25:17PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > I don't entirely agree. The features added by this patch are necessary
> > to address the issues with SA in combination with SMP, are they not?
> Stephan's patch addresses the crash issues. Christian, in addition,
> made some scheduling and affinity improvements. They're not needed
> to avoid the SMP+SA crashes.
My main point was that it seems like there are parts we're happy with, and
parts that need more work/thought/discussion. Let's check in what we're
happy with now, rather than waiting for more discussion. Also, my
understanding is that some of these changes will improve life for UP