Subject: Re: fsync performance hit on 1.6.1
To: None <email@example.com>
From: gabriel rosenkoetter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/08/2003 07:31:35
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:32:04AM +0200, Daniel Brewer wrote:
> Our system is a lot more complex than just 1 image source and 1 image sin=
> We have several other processes that may also require images. The file,
> although it may have its drawbacks, does allow multiple processes to use =
> same image data without replicating it all over the place.
How does SysV shm not provide that same capability?
And with semaphores, you can have the writer lock gracefully too...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----