Subject: Re: fsync performance hit on 1.6.1
To: enami tsugutomo <>
From: Chuck Silvers <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 07/07/2003 09:29:52
ah right, msync() without MS_INVALIDATE on just the range of each write()
should have the same effect as fsync(), but faster.  it's been
a while since I looked any of the pgo_put routines, I'm forgetting
them already.  :)


On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:55:05AM +0900, enami tsugutomo wrote:
> Chuck Silvers <> writes:
> > if you do continue to access the data after you've written it, then
> > I don't have any good ideas.
> Since the range need to sync each time looks relatively small from
> later post, msync()ing only the range will result tranvasal by range
> rather than list, won't it?
> enami.