Subject: Re: fsync performance hit on 1.6.1
To: Chuck Silvers <>
From: enami tsugutomo <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 07/07/2003 10:55:05
Chuck Silvers <> writes:

> if you do continue to access the data after you've written it, then
> I don't have any good ideas.

Since the range need to sync each time looks relatively small from
later post, msync()ing only the range will result tranvasal by range
rather than list, won't it?