In article <20030625003728.24391.qmail@web41206.mail.yahoo.com>, Gary Thorpe wrote:
   > 
   > And there own test run on Linux shows that the M:N implementation is
   > better (scales better) when compared the 1:1 implementation for this
   > particular OS.
   
   That's nice. Nevertheless, I think it has been established that a 1:1
   implementation can in fact achieve more than 'good enough' scalability at a
   much lower cost in terms of implementation complexity. _That's_ the real
   issue.


exactly where was it established?
   

.mrg.