In article <20030625003728.24391.qmail@web41206.mail.yahoo.com>, Gary Thorpe wrote:
> 
> And there own test run on Linux shows that the M:N implementation is
> better (scales better) when compared the 1:1 implementation for this
> particular OS.

That's nice. Nevertheless, I think it has been established that a 1:1
implementation can in fact achieve more than 'good enough' scalability at a
much lower cost in terms of implementation complexity. _That's_ the real
issue.