Subject: Re: rough SA patch (works on SMP)
To: Greywolf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 06/25/2003 22:39:19
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:02:58PM -0700, Greywolf wrote:
> Opinion survey: Would dump(8) benefit from SA/LWP?
If a dump was written to have multiple threads instead of processes then
I'd hope that new dump had a decent locking protocol.
The dump in 1.6 is useless for me because it insists on sending itself
signals before it is ready. This causes it to hang. I do backups
with pax instead because pax, uh, works.
(My plate is full. I figure at the rate I'm going I can have a new
dump written in a couple of years. *sigh*)
Kevin P. Neal http://www.pobox.com/~kpn/
On the community of supercomputer fans:
"But what we lack in size we make up for in eccentricity."
from Steve Gombosi, comp.sys.super, 31 Jul 2000 11:22:43 -0600