Umm...not for anyone to easily see/know it's there to work with unless they
happened to have already seen this thread.

James

>
>it'll still be in the cvs...
>
>On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:38:40AM -0400, James Chacon wrote:
>> If there are no plans for developing a new one, then leave the existing
>> as-is. Removing even semi-working code because it's not perfect isn't a
>> good idea as it then prevents other people from possibly improving it later.
>> 
>> James
>> 
>> >
>> >From: James Chacon <jmc@netbsd.org>
>> >Subject: Re: IEEE 1394 isochronous transmission code will be removed.
>> >Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 00:33:07 -0400 (EDT)
>> >Message-ID: <200306090433.AAA14016@chacons.net>
>> >
>> > > Why not leave it there for now and then insert a new model later? If it's
>> > > incomplete today folks should be able to experiment with it rather than have
>> > > it yanked out...
>> > > 
>> > > James
>> >
>> >Yes, you are right.  But it is imcomplete and modelled not
>> >very good...
>> >
>> >I want to know whether anyone working on it.  If it has been
>> >abandoned and there are no plan of using it, I want to
>> >remove it in the future, regardless of development of new
>> >driver.
>> >
>> >Right now I have no plan of developing new iso transmission
>> >driver.  So I'm expecting other programmers will work on
>> >this issue;-)
>> >-- 
>> >KH
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> 
>
>
>