Subject: Re: IEEE 1394 isochronous transmission code will be removed.
To: James Chacon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 06/12/2003 01:21:27
it'll still be in the cvs...
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:38:40AM -0400, James Chacon wrote:
> If there are no plans for developing a new one, then leave the existing
> as-is. Removing even semi-working code because it's not perfect isn't a
> good idea as it then prevents other people from possibly improving it later.
> >From: James Chacon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >Subject: Re: IEEE 1394 isochronous transmission code will be removed.
> >Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 00:33:07 -0400 (EDT)
> >Message-ID: <200306090433.AAA14016@chacons.net>
> > > Why not leave it there for now and then insert a new model later? If it's
> > > incomplete today folks should be able to experiment with it rather than have
> > > it yanked out...
> > >
> > > James
> >Yes, you are right. But it is imcomplete and modelled not
> >very good...
> >I want to know whether anyone working on it. If it has been
> >abandoned and there are no plan of using it, I want to
> >remove it in the future, regardless of development of new
> >Right now I have no plan of developing new iso transmission
> >driver. So I'm expecting other programmers will work on
> >this issue;-)