Subject: Re: Minimum swap size
To: Sean Davis <dive@endersgame.net>
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/20/2003 00:03:50
> > >
> > > Uhh, in my case, for example, with one 120GB drive and one 20GB drive, even
> > > partitioned into a bunch of bits (the biggest being 60GB), checking that
> > > 60GB partition does take a hell of a long time. I wouldn't want it all in
> >
> > if system crashes, all partition has to be checked anyway...
>
> yes, but checking multiple smaller partitions seems to take less time than
> checking one huge partition.
>
??? hmm... really??
why?