Subject: Re: Minimum swap size
To: Wojciech Puchar <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Sean Davis <email@example.com>
Date: 05/19/2003 19:37:19
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Uhh, in my case, for example, with one 120GB drive and one 20GB drive, even
> > > > partitioned into a bunch of bits (the biggest being 60GB), checking that
> > > > 60GB partition does take a hell of a long time. I wouldn't want it all in
> > >
> > > if system crashes, all partition has to be checked anyway...
> > yes, but checking multiple smaller partitions seems to take less time than
> > checking one huge partition.
> ??? hmm... really??
perhaps because there is more filesystem information due to the extra
superblock backups, I have no clue. I'm no filesystem guru.
/~\ The ASCII
\ / Ribbon Campaign Sean Davis
X Against HTML aka dive
/ \ Email!