Subject: Re: Simplify pmap->uvm reporting of KVA boundaries
To: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Chris Jepeway <email@example.com>
Date: 05/04/2003 15:42:06
> Comments appreciated... of course I'll also update the pmap(9)
> documentation when I get ready to check the patch in.
Just some naming pedantry...
This code suggests to me that "virtual_avail" is
the start of KVA.
> + virtual_avail = VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS;
> + virtual_end = VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS - PAGE_SIZE;
Why not call it virtual_begin to match the name virtual_end?
virtual_avail seems to mean "total amount of available VM,"
and that the start addr of KVA should be virtual_end - virtual_avail.
> -- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>