Subject: Re: kernel panic messages
To: NetBSD Kernel Technical Discussion List <tech-kern@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Greg A. Woods <email@example.com>
Date: 05/03/2003 14:49:04
[ On Saturday, May 3, 2003 at 17:57:29 (+0200), Martin Husemann wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: kernel panic messages
> On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 01:45:10AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> > i've been rather annoyed by a panic message not being unique
> > in the past. a simple additional number for strings for now
> > would not be a step backwards...
> how about changing the panic signature to include __FILE__ and __LINE__ just
> before the const char * fmt?
I've always wondered why it wasn't done this way in the first place....
(or at least in more recent BSDs :-)
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>
Planix, Inc. <firstname.lastname@example.org>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <email@example.com>