--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 10:54:57PM +0100, Robert Swindells wrote:
> 
> Does anyone feel that it is ok to break the mapping in sys/net/netisr.h
> from address family number to soft interrupt bit number ?
> 
> The next free address family number is 31, which conflicts with NETISR_PPP
> if __HAVE_GENERIC_SOFT_INTERRUPTS isn't defined.
> 
> Any address family numbers after this that need a soft interrupt will
> overflow the int netisr variable anyway.

What protocol do you want to implement?
	-is

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE+qDpjPCRcZ/VMtk4RAk0+AKCJuqpK25rCI6Hb2DlgPepS8kBRAwCeOyii
XKEbyzDOsGaAWdYY1aKYTNA=
=iI6B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--