Subject: Re: statfs changes
To: enami tsugutomo <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/24/2003 04:26:28
On Apr 23, 10:34am, email@example.com (enami tsugutomo) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: statfs changes
| - Possibiliy we need to extend struct statfs so that it can have full
Definitely, but passing a struct of ~100 bytes + 2 x maxpathlen does not
seem attractive to me. I am open to ideas here.
| - Current error handling when set_statfs_info() failed is poor. E.g.,
| ffs_mount returns an error but doesn't undo the actual mount work.
| - fs_fsmnt (in case of ffs) isn't updated.
I'll fix those asap [in the next two weeks, because I am in greece now],
unless you get to it before me.