Subject: Address families
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Robert Swindells <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/22/2003 22:54:57
Does anyone feel that it is ok to break the mapping in sys/net/netisr.h
from address family number to soft interrupt bit number ?
The next free address family number is 31, which conflicts with NETISR_PPP
if __HAVE_GENERIC_SOFT_INTERRUPTS isn't defined.
Any address family numbers after this that need a soft interrupt will
overflow the int netisr variable anyway.