Subject: Re: Remove printf %b support from libsa?
To: Ben Harris <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 04/20/2003 12:22:54
On Sunday, April 20, 2003, at 12:16 PM, Ben Harris wrote:
> Removing %b support from libsa as well would save 184 bytes on ARM, and
> presumably a similar amount on other architectures. I suspect this
> be good for those architectures whose bootloaders are currently
> overflowing (e.g. pmax by 248 bytes).
Sounds good, please nuke it.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>