Subject: Re: Remove printf %b support from libsa?
To: Ben Harris <>
From: Jason Thorpe <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 04/20/2003 12:22:54
On Sunday, April 20, 2003, at 12:16  PM, Ben Harris wrote:

> Removing %b support from libsa as well would save 184 bytes on ARM, and
> presumably a similar amount on other architectures.  I suspect this 
> would
> be good for those architectures whose bootloaders are currently
> overflowing (e.g. pmax by 248 bytes).

Sounds good, please nuke it.

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <>