On Sun, 20 Apr 2003, Ben Harris wrote:

> Removing %b support from libsa as well would save 184 bytes on ARM, and
> presumably a similar amount on other architectures.  I suspect this would
> be good for those architectures whose bootloaders are currently
> overflowing (e.g. pmax by 248 bytes).

Ignore my comments about pmax -- it doesn't use libsa's printf.

> Can anyone think of a reason why I shouldn't do this?  In particular, is
> %b used somewhere I haven't noticed?

I still think this would be sensible.

-- 
Ben Harris                                                   <bjh21@netbsd.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/acorn26           <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/acorn26/>