The libsa version of printf() currently supports the "%b" format for
printing bitmasks.  As far as I can tell, nothing uses this (at least in
sys/lib/libsa and sys/arch/*/stand), and the equivalent in the kernel
printf was removed in August 2000.

Removing %b support from libsa as well would save 184 bytes on ARM, and
presumably a similar amount on other architectures.  I suspect this would
be good for those architectures whose bootloaders are currently
overflowing (e.g. pmax by 248 bytes).

Can anyone think of a reason why I shouldn't do this?  In particular, is
%b used somewhere I haven't noticed?

-- 
Ben Harris                                                   <bjh21@netbsd.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/acorn26           <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/acorn26/>