Subject: Re: Some LFS vs. FFS+softdep testresults
To: Frank van der Linden <>
From: Rick Kelly <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/29/2003 20:01:58
Frank van der Linden said:

>A preliminary conclusion is that LFS is now pretty stable for normal
>usage (although I didn't create any disk-nearly-full situations
>which make LFS' life hard), and then it does quite well. The write
>case is worth some investigation.

I think it is fair to say that LFS is getting to a point where we don't
need to worry about jfs, xfs, ext3fs, etc. Add some tools for growing
and shrinking...
Rick Kelly