> appropriate, way to implement non-volatile data storage requirements.
> Still, it's doubtful that embedded systems will be the driving force
> behind whether a journalled filesystem should be included in NetBSD.

and journalled filesystems probably don't work well (or waste lot of
space) on small partitions like flash devices.

> bypass contaminating the kernel with the GPL (i.e. support the
> filesystems with loadable modules)?  And maybe more importantly, would
> such an alternative be desirable even if it were feasible?

i think finnishing up  netbsd lfs is most important.