Subject: Re: sig*wait() implementation, RFC
To: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Jaromir Dolecek <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/10/2003 23:27:34
Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> Perhaps the system call should be __sigtimedwait, which takes a non-const
> timespec *, and updates the timeout parameter to indicate how much time is
> left? Then the sigtimedwait syscall could simply copy the const timespec
> to a non-const, and pass the non-const.
Yep, this might be one option. But kernel doesn't have easy way to know how
long the LWP slept in ltsleep(), does it?
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org> http://www.NetBSD.org/
-=- We should be mindful of the potential goal, but as the tantric -=-
-=- Buddhist masters say, ``You may notice during meditation that you -=-
-=- sometimes levitate or glow. Do not let this distract you.'' -=-