Subject: Re: DEV_B_SIZE
To: Alfred Perlstein <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 01/31/2003 20:21:16
In message <20030131191127.GS85104@elvis.mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
>I hope I'm not mistaken here, but for FFS to work it needs the 512
>byte ops to be atomic, making them not so, or possibly obliterate
>surrounding blocks doesn't sound like a good idea at all.
UFS/FFS has no 512 bytes binding, it can work in other sectorsizes.
The implication is that your fragment size may increase.
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.